Register
Sign-In
View Cart
|
 |
      |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<- Return to List
|
|
|
Geographically Confined October 13, 2009 ? 53 Comments Janet ?Pat? Napolitano our intrepid Homeland Security Secretary, went out on her own little ?get their minds off of Obama?s health scam? tour last weekend. Napolitano did what all liberals do instinctively, she used a vast number of words to say as little as possible.. Her discourse ran the gamut from the sublime to the ridiculous. In ?Napolitano Says Al-Qaeda-Style Terrorists Are in U.S. (Bloomberg.com) we read that during an interview with Bloomberg television, Napolitano said, ?There are individuals in the Unites States who ascribe to al-Qaeda-type beliefs..? What a sagacious soothsayer Napolitano is.. If you just counted the liberals alone with their politics of ?target America first?, there are easily multiple millions here that fall into that category and that?s before you get around to tabulating the Muslims. Have no fear, Napolitano says that ?law-enforcement authorities are tracking terrorists with al-Qaeda leanings in the U.S.? Killing them is much more palatable than ?tracking? them. Fattening them up at Guantanamo and then releasing them back into the wild just delays the inevitable. Playing progressive patty-cake with them accomplishes nothing. When it comes to the liberals and their declared ?War on The War on Terror?, accomplishing nothing is what they are all about. |
October 21, 2009 |
|
|
Geographically Confined
October 13, 2009 ? 53 Comments
Janet ?Pat? Napolitano our intrepid Homeland Security Secretary, went out on her own little ?get their minds off of Obama?s health scam? tour last weekend. Napolitano did what all liberals do instinctively, she used a vast number of words to say as little as possible.. Her discourse ran the gamut from the sublime to the ridiculous.
In ?Napolitano Says Al-Qaeda-Style Terrorists Are in U.S. (Bloomberg.com) we read that during an interview with Bloomberg television, Napolitano said, ?There are individuals in the Unites States who ascribe to al-Qaeda-type beliefs..? What a sagacious soothsayer Napolitano is.. If you just counted the liberals alone with their politics of ?target America first?, there are easily multiple millions here that fall into that category and that?s before you get around to tabulating the Muslims.
Have no fear, Napolitano says that ?law-enforcement authorities are tracking terrorists with al-Qaeda leanings in the U.S.? Killing them is much more palatable than ?tracking? them. Fattening them up at Guantanamo and then releasing them back into the wild just delays the inevitable. Playing progressive patty-cake with them accomplishes nothing. When it comes to the liberals and their declared ?War on The War on Terror?, accomplishing nothing is what they are all about.
Napolitano spoke of ?effective law enforcement?. What on Earth does that mean when a liberal speaks those words? ?Effective? in what way? The liberals have softened everything within their path, they are the equivalent of intellectual Ex-Lax.. Things that have been proven to be ?effective? in the past have been liberally re-classified as ?hateful? or ?discriminatory? or some other lachrymose liberal lunacy. The liberals have spent altogether too much time targeting those who defend America and defending those who target America. It would be nice to know just exactly what Napolitano means by ?effective?..
Napolitano believes that ?intelligence tips on terror suspects are more important than a system to track visitors leaving the country..? So if law enforcement follows the same path, the liberals call it ?profiling? or ?Islamophobia? but if an untrained civilian calls a telephone bank anonymously, this is now considered to be an ?intelligence tip?.. As well, when a ?terror suspect? with hate in his heart, too many hyphens in his name and rug burns on his forehead LEAVES the country, is that a bad thing? So now the local cab stand has one more malodorous maniacal Muslim to replace.. (File under: Jobs Americans won?t do..) I feel so much safer. I didn?t know that the Obama administration was ?tracking? terrorists like wayward sperm whales. If they were ?tracking? them to terminate them that would be a different story indeed.. When the ACLU gets wind of all of this ?tracking? stuff, they will have to defend the terrorist?s right to terrorize while calling this tracking an ?invasion of the terrorist?s privacy and their right to murder infidels unimpeded?..
?The government has put money into gathering intelligence about the movements of terrorist suspects.. The key thing is intelligence analysts.? (What HASN?T this liberal oligarchy ?put money into?..) No, the KEY THING is killing the terrorists wherever they may be. With the liberal Lilliputians, we can?t even give the terrorists an involuntary bath or two without the leftists going into a diarrhea panic. The idea should be to make the terrorists permanently immobile, not gathering intelligence about their ?movements?..
?The government can?t track the more than 200,000 people who have intentionally overstayed their visas. Such a system would be very, very expensive and laborious to have..? ?Very, very expensive?? Since when has that obstacle stopped or even slowed the liberals and their inebriated attitude toward ?spending?? No one said that it had to be ?effective?, just throw money at it.. We can?t seem to locate up to twenty million illegal immigrants (but Obama wants to legalize them so that they can vote Democratic as well as get the ?health care that they deserve?..) and now we can?t locate 200,000 visa violators, a number of whom have the goal of being voted ?Most Valuable Slayer? at the Mosque of the Furrowed Brow..
Napolitano believes that ?successes against al-Qaeda have helped keep the main organization holed up in the tribal region of northwest Pakistan..? Sounds like all of this ?intelligence gathering? has shown the Obama administration where the terrorists are ?gathering?, so what say we ?gather? a few thousand tons of ordnance and direct it at this little ?gathering? place? Shouldn?t that be the end result of any ?intelligence gathering? is the removal of the threat or is this just an opportunity for the Obama simpletons to ?play Army? on their socialist sand tables? The question becomes, will Obama prove to be as milquetoasty as Clinton was when the ?gathered intelligence? located Bin Laden on several occasions? Intelligence without action is irrelevant. Action without intelligence is liberalism..
?Through a variety of means? we have ?confined them geographically?. If what she says is true, the Obamazombies know where they are. Collateral damage be damned. Besides, wouldn?t it be a ?change? for some else to have to erect a marble monument to their dead?
They AREN?T ?confined geographically?. (If they were, wouldn?t that be a situation that they ?inherited from the previous administration??)
The liberal enablers have swung the doors open to the terrorists. Who do we have to thank? Barney Frank and Dead Ted.
Bath house Barney did his worst work relative to the 1990 ?Immigration and Nationality Act? (INA). Barney demanded that the ?exclusion provisions? be fixed.. In order to protect the backsides of his gay constituents, (easy now..) Frank enabled Islamist ideologues to waltz into America. Even the warnings of the ?Avalon Project? from the Yale law school were ignored.. Dead Ted helped years before with his ?work? on the 1965 ?Immigration and Nationality Act?. On the floor of the Senate he said, ?the bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs..? These two liberal ?leaders? paved the way for that which has transpired. They have also enabled those who now conspire..
Napolitano also went over and visited with the viragos on ?The View? and then she dropped into see the intellectual wizard Jon Stewart at the ?Gaily Show?. She was ?seeking different venues from which to discuss homeland-security issues..? Those would both certainly qualify as ?different? venues to say the least.. Leave it to the liberals to ?discuss? homeland security as opposed to actually doing something about it. They may be of the childish belief that the terrorists are ?geographically confined? but that belief is grounded within the fact that the liberals themselves are intellectually confined..
|
|
|
*multi-media link*
|
|
|
|
|
|
